Abstract:
The livelihood of small-scale coffee farmers in Hai and Arumeru Districts depends on
coffee among other economic activities. This study analysed influence of livelihood
capabilities on coffee production among small-scale coffee farmers in Hai and Arumeru
Districts. Specifically, the study intended to: examine the implications of livelihood
capabilities on coffee production trends; assess the implications of livelihood capabilities
on coffee farming inputs; determine the association between livelihood capabilities and
access to extension services, and determine the livelihood capabilities diversification
strategies among small-scale coffee farmers. A cross-sectional research design using a
mixed methods approach was applied in this study to collect qualitative and quantitative
data from 250 respondents using households’ survey, key informant interview-(KII),
focus group discussion-(FGDs) and documentary review. Qualitative data were analysed
using content analysis while quantitative data were analysed using trend analysis, chisquare and cross-tabulation. The results indicate that the small-scale coffee farmers were
categorized into four capability levels; no capability (9.2%), low capability (39.2%),
moderate capability (18.4%) and high capability (33.2%) respectively. Coffee production
and income generated from coffee have been fluctuating from time to time and therefore
affecting the livelihood of small-scale farmers. It was revealed that the critical problem
facing a small-scale coffee farmer was inputs un-affordability. Generally, lack of market
and low coffee price, inadequate farming inputs and extension services have compelled
small-scale coffee farmers to diversify their economic activities. Further, the study
concludes that there is a critical shortage of coffee farming inputs and extension services
among small-scale farmers which to a large extent has resulted into low coffee
production. There is a need of small-scale coffee farmers to form groups in order to lay
down strategies on how to improve coffee production and how to secure market.
However, districts administrative authorities and AMCOS should collaborate to improve the quality and quantity of coffee produced. This can be done by ensuring the timely
availability of coffee farming inputs and extension services among small-scale farmers. In
so doing, this will improve not only coffee production but also the livelihood capabilities
among small-scale farmers.
Description:
A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Sokoine University Of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania